l9n/ North Dakota

2011 Regular Session, 2011–2012

House Concurrent Resolution 3036

A concurrent resolution directing the Legislative Management to study the trial by jury rights of a person charged with the commission of a misdemeanor, including the extent to which jury trials are conducted in the state for cases involving misdemeanor offenses; the costs of jury trials for misdemeanor offenses; the feasibility and desirability of eliminating the sentencing option of imprisonment for Class B misdemeanors; a review of the jury trial process of other states; and the right to a jury trial in civil traffic cases.

Filed with the Secretary of State, on April 12, 2011.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

A concurrent resolution directing the Legislative Management to study the trial by jury rights of a person charged with the commission of a misdemeanor, including the extent to which jury trials are conducted in the state for cases involving misdemeanor offenses; the costs of jury trials for misdemeanor offenses; the feasibility and desirability of eliminating the sentencing option of imprisonment for Class B misdemeanors; a review of the jury trial process of other states; and the right to a jury trial in civil traffic cases.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

5 co-sponsors

Randy Boehning, Lois Delmore, David Hogue, Dave Nething, Curtis Olafson

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

  • Judiciary13–0

    Do pass · Feb 15 · 1 present

  • Judiciary6–0

    Do pass as amended · Mar 24

  • House of Representatives, adoption82–7

    Passed · Apr 7

Amendments

Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

  • Senate committee amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Mar 25

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Feb 8 – Feb 18

  1. Feb 8Introduced and sent to Judiciary
  2. Feb 14Heard in Judiciary
  3. Feb 15Judiciary recommended it, 13 to 0
  4. Feb 18Adopted in the House of Representatives

In the Senate Feb 21 – Mar 28

  1. Feb 21Arrived in the Senate
  2. Feb 23Read a first time and sent to Judiciary
  3. Mar 9Heard in Judiciary
  4. Mar 24Judiciary recommended it as amended, 6 to 0
  5. Mar 25Amended as the committee recommended
  6. Mar 28Adopted in the Senate

In the House of Representatives Mar 29 – Apr 7

  1. Mar 29Returned to the House of Representatives
  2. Apr 7The House of Representatives agreed to the other chamber's changes
  3. Adopted in the House of Representatives, 82 to 7

In the Senate Apr 8

  1. Apr 8Signed in the Senate

In the House of Representatives Apr 12

  1. Apr 12Signed in the House of Representatives
  2. Filed with the Secretary of State
All 16 actions, as published
  1. Feb 8Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary CommitteeHouse of Representatives
  2. Feb 14Committee Hearing 02:30House of Representatives
  3. Feb 15Reported back, do pass, placed on consent calendar 13 0 1House of Representatives
  4. Feb 18Second reading, adoptedHouse of Representatives
  5. Feb 21Received from HouseSenate
  6. Feb 23Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary CommitteeSenate
  7. Mar 9Committee Hearing 10:30Senate
  8. Mar 24Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 6 0 0Senate
  9. Mar 25Amendment adopted, placed on calendarSenate
  10. Mar 28Second reading, adopted as amendedSenate
  11. Mar 29Returned to House (12)House of Representatives
  12. Apr 7ConcurredHouse of Representatives
  13. Apr 7Second reading, adopted yeas 82 nays 7House of Representatives
  14. Apr 8Signed by PresidentSenate
  15. Apr 12Signed by SpeakerHouse of Representatives
  16. Apr 12Filed with Secretary Of State 04/12House of Representatives