l9n/ North Dakota

2011 Regular Session, 2011–2012

House Concurrent Resolution 3047

Relating to the appointment of a member of the legislative assembly to a full-time appointive state office.

Passed both houses on April 20, 2011, and goes to the voters.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

A concurrent resolution to amend and reenact section 6 of article IV of the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to the appointment of a member of the legislative assembly to a full-time appointive state office.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

2 co-sponsors

Kim Koppelman, Randel Christmann

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

  • Constitutional Revision10–0

    Do pass · Mar 29 · 1 present

  • House of Representatives, second reading87–5

    Passed · Mar 30

  • Judiciary5–1

    Do not pass · Apr 6

  • Judiciary4–2

    Do pass as amended · Apr 12

  • Senate, second reading36–11

    Passed · Apr 12

  • House of Representatives, second reading89–5

    Passed · Apr 18

  • Senate, second reading39–8

    Passed · Apr 19

Amendments

Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

  • House of Representatives amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Apr 18

  • Senate committee amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Apr 12

  • Senate amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Apr 19

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Feb 23 – Mar 30

  1. Introduced and sent to Constitutional Revision
  2. Heard in Constitutional Revision
  3. Constitutional Revision recommended it, 10 to 0
  4. Adopted in the House of Representatives, 87 to 5

In the Senate Mar 31 – Apr 12

  1. Arrived in the Senate
  2. Read a first time and sent to Judiciary
  3. Heard in Judiciary
  4. Judiciary recommended against it, 5 to 1
  5. Sent to Judiciary
  6. Judiciary recommended it as amended, 4 to 2
  7. Amended as the committee recommended
  8. Adopted in the Senate, 36 to 11

In the House of Representatives Apr 12 – Apr 14

  1. Returned to the House of Representatives
  2. The House of Representatives refused the other chamber's changes
  3. Sent to a conference committee

In the Senate Apr 14

  1. Sent to a conference committee

In the House of Representatives Apr 18

  1. The conference committee recommended amending it
  2. The House of Representatives adopted the conference committee's report
  3. Adopted in the House of Representatives, 89 to 5

In the Senate Apr 18 – Apr 20

  1. The conference committee recommended amending it
  2. The Senate adopted the conference committee's report
  3. Adopted in the Senate, 39 to 8
  4. Signed in the Senate

In the House of Representatives Apr 20

  1. Signed in the House of Representatives
  2. Filed with the Secretary of State
All 25 actions, as published