l9n/ North Dakota

2011 Regular Session, 2011–2012

Senate Bill 2184

Relating to the feasibility and desirability of extending the sales tax exemption on purchases of tangible property to all charitable nonprofit organizations and comparative analysis of the efficacy of sales tax exemptions or rate reductions.

Did not become law. It stopped in the House of Representatives on March 21, 2011. The 62nd Legislative Assembly has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

A BILL for an Act to provide for a legislative management study relating to the feasibility and desirability of extending the sales tax exemption on purchases of tangible property to all charitable nonprofit organizations and comparative analysis of the efficacy of sales tax exemptions or rate reductions.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the Senate

3 co-sponsors

Dwight Cook, Larry Bellew, Robin Weisz

Its course

January 11 to March 21, 2011, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action11 actions on 11 days

In the SenateJan 11 to Feb 1030 days

Finance and TaxationJan 11 to Feb 828 days

In the House of RepresentativesFeb 10 to Mar 21 · stopped39 days

Finance and TaxationFeb 23 to Mar 1520 days

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

  • Finance and Taxation7–0

    Do pass as amended · Feb 8

  • Senate, second reading47–0

    Passed · Feb 10

  • Finance and Taxation12–2

    Do not pass · Mar 15

  • House of Representatives, second reading21–71

    Failed · Mar 21

Amendments

Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

  • Senate committee amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Feb 9

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the Senate Jan 11 – Feb 10

  1. Jan 11Introduced and sent to Finance and Taxation
  2. Jan 18Heard in Finance and Taxation
  3. Feb 8Finance and Taxation recommended it as amended, 7 to 0
  4. Feb 9Amended as the committee recommended
  5. Feb 10Passed the Senate, 47 to 0

In the House of Representatives Feb 11 – Mar 21

  1. Feb 11Arrived in the House of Representatives
  2. Feb 23Read a first time and sent to Finance and Taxation
  3. Mar 9Heard in Finance and Taxation
  4. Mar 15Finance and Taxation recommended against it, 12 to 2
  5. Mar 21Failed in the House of Representatives, 21 to 71
All 11 actions, as published
  1. Jan 11Introduced, first reading, referred Finance and Taxation CommitteeSenate
  2. Jan 18Committee Hearing 09:30Senate
  3. Feb 8Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 7 0 0Senate
  4. Feb 9Amendment adopted, placed on calendarSenate
  5. Feb 10Second reading, passed, yeas 47 nays 0Senate
  6. Feb 11Received from SenateHouse of Representatives
  7. Feb 23Introduced, first reading, referred Finance and Taxation CommitteeHouse of Representatives
  8. Mar 9Committee Hearing 09:15House of Representatives
  9. Mar 15Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar 12 2 0House of Representatives
  10. Mar 17Laid over one legislative dayHouse of Representatives
  11. Mar 21Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 21 nays 71House of Representatives