l9n/ North Dakota

2013 Regular Session, 2013–2014

House Bill 1242

Relating to property tax statement improvement; to amend and reenact section 57‑20‑07.1 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to property tax statement inclusion of information to identify the dollar amount of property tax relief provided through legislative appropriation; and to provide an effective date.

Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate on April 10, 2013. The 63rd Legislative Assembly has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact section 57-20-07.1 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to property tax statement inclusion of information to identify the dollar amount of property tax relief provided through legislative appropriation; and to provide an effective date.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

11 co-sponsors

Thomas Beadle, Mark A. Dosch, Brenda Heller, Jim Kasper, Lisa Meier, Mark S. Owens, Karen M. Rohr, Spencer Berry, Tim Flakoll, Lonnie J. Laffen, Donald Schaible

Its course

January 14 to April 10, 2013, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action11 actions on 10 days

In the House of RepresentativesJan 14 to Feb 2239 days

Political SubdivisionsJan 14 to Feb 1532 days

Political SubdivisionsFeb 18 to Feb 224 days

In the SenateFeb 22 to Apr 10 · stopped47 days

Finance and TaxationFeb 28 to Apr 839 days

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Jan 14 – Feb 22

  1. Jan 14Introduced and sent to Political Subdivisions
  2. Feb 8Heard in Political Subdivisions
  3. Feb 15Political Subdivisions recommended it, 11 to 4
  4. Feb 18Sent to Political Subdivisions
  5. Feb 22Political Subdivisions recommended it, 11 to 4
  6. Passed the House of Representatives, 73 to 18

In the Senate Feb 25 – Apr 10

  1. Feb 25Arrived in the Senate
  2. Feb 28Read a first time and sent to Finance and Taxation
  3. Mar 20Heard in Finance and Taxation
  4. Apr 8Finance and Taxation recommended against it, 7 to 0
  5. Apr 10Failed in the Senate, 3 to 44
All 11 actions, as published
  1. Jan 14Introduced, first reading, referred Political Subdivisions CommitteeHouse of Representatives
  2. Feb 8Committee Hearing 10:00House of Representatives
  3. Feb 15Reported back, do pass, place on calendar 11 4 0House of Representatives
  4. Feb 18Rereferred to Political SubdivisionsHouse of Representatives
  5. Feb 22Reported back, do pass, place on calendar 11 4 0House of Representatives
  6. Feb 22Second reading, passed, yeas 73 nays 18House of Representatives
  7. Feb 25Received from HouseSenate
  8. Feb 28Introduced, first reading, referred Finance and Taxation CommitteeSenate
  9. Mar 20Committee Hearing 10:15Senate
  10. Apr 8Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar 7 0 0Senate
  11. Apr 10Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 3 nays 44Senate