l9n/ North Dakota

2013 Regular Session, 2013–2014

House Concurrent Resolution 3033

A concurrent resolution directing the Legislative Management to study opportunities to reduce the risk of death and disease among smokers who will not quit smoking, by considering tobacco harm reduction strategies that encourage smokers to switch from cigarettes to less risky tobacco products and by accurately informing the public of the health risks posed by smokeless tobacco products, vapor products, and tobacco-derived products relative to cigarettes.

Failed in the Senate, 7 to 38, on April 4, 2013.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

A concurrent resolution directing the Legislative Management to study opportunities to reduce the risk of death and disease among smokers who will not quit smoking, by considering tobacco harm reduction strategies that encourage smokers to switch from cigarettes to less risky tobacco products and by accurately informing the public of the health risks posed by smokeless tobacco products, vapor products, and tobacco-derived products relative to cigarettes.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

10 co-sponsors

Josh Boschee, Nancy Johnson, Jim Kasper, Andrew G. Maragos, Jon O. Nelson, Marvin E. Nelson, Dick Dever, Lonnie J. Laffen, Oley Larsen, David O'Connell

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

  • Human Services12–1

    Do not pass · Mar 12

  • House of Representatives, adoption48–46

    Passed · Mar 13

  • Human Services3–2

    Do pass · Apr 3

  • Senate, adoption7–38

    Failed · Apr 4

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Feb 8 – Mar 13

  1. Feb 8Introduced and sent to Human Services
  2. Feb 25Heard in Human Services
  3. Mar 12Human Services recommended against it, 12 to 1
  4. Mar 13Adopted in the House of Representatives, 48 to 46

In the Senate Mar 14 – Apr 4

  1. Mar 14Arrived in the Senate
  2. Read a first time and sent to Human Services
  3. Apr 2Heard in Human Services
  4. Apr 3Human Services recommended it, 3 to 2
  5. Apr 4Failed in the Senate, 7 to 38
All 9 actions, as published
  1. Feb 8Introduced, first reading, referred Human Services CommitteeHouse of Representatives
  2. Feb 25Committee Hearing 02:30House of Representatives
  3. Mar 12Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar 12 1 0House of Representatives
  4. Mar 13Second reading, adopted yeas 48 nays 46House of Representatives
  5. Mar 14Received from HouseSenate
  6. Mar 14Introduced, first reading, referred Human Services CommitteeSenate
  7. Apr 2Committee Hearing 10:00Senate
  8. Apr 3Reported back, do pass, place on calendar 3 2 0Senate
  9. Apr 4Second reading, failed to adopt yeas 7 nays 38Senate