l9n/ North Dakota

2013 Regular Session, 2013–2014

Senate Bill 2257

Relating to postcommitment procedures in cases of civil commitment of sexually dangerous individuals.

Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate on April 16, 2013. The 63rd Legislative Assembly has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

A BILL for an Act to provide for a legislative management study of the state hospital's program for the evaluation and treatment of civilly committed sexually dangerous individuals.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the Senate

5 co-sponsors

Tyler Axness, Ralph Kilzer, Bill Devlin, Todd Porter, Nathan Toman

Its course

January 21 to April 16, 2013, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action17 actions on 14 days

In the SenateJan 21 to Feb 111 days

JudiciaryJan 21 to Jan 309 days

In the House of RepresentativesFeb 1 to Apr 361 days

JudiciaryFeb 18 to Apr 243 days

Back in the SenateApr 3 to Apr 16 · stopped13 days

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

  • Judiciary7–0

    Do pass · Jan 30

  • Senate, second reading38–7

    Passed · Feb 1

  • Judiciary14–0

    Do pass as amended · Apr 2

  • House of Representatives, second reading91–0

    Passed · Apr 3

  • Senate, second reading21–26

    Failed · Apr 16

Amendments

Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

  • House of Representatives committee amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Apr 3

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the Senate Jan 21 – Feb 1

  1. Jan 21Introduced and sent to Judiciary
  2. Jan 28Heard in Judiciary
  3. Jan 30Judiciary recommended it, 7 to 0
  4. Feb 1Passed the Senate, 38 to 7

In the House of Representatives Feb 4 – Apr 3

  1. Feb 4Arrived in the House of Representatives
  2. Feb 18Read a first time and sent to Judiciary
  3. Mar 20Heard in Judiciary
  4. Apr 2Judiciary recommended it as amended, 14 to 0
  5. Apr 3Amended as the committee recommended
  6. Passed the House of Representatives, 91 to 0

Back in the Senate Apr 4 – Apr 16

  1. Apr 4Returned to the Senate
  2. Apr 8The Senate refused the other chamber's changes
  3. Sent to a conference committee
  4. Apr 10Sent to a conference committee
  5. Apr 12The conference committee reported
  6. Apr 16The Senate adopted the conference committee's report
  7. Failed in the Senate, 21 to 26
All 17 actions, as published
  1. Jan 21Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary CommitteeSenate
  2. Jan 28Committee Hearing 09:30Senate
  3. Jan 30Reported back, do pass, place on calendar 7 0 0Senate
  4. Feb 1Second reading, passed, yeas 38 nays 7Senate
  5. Feb 4Received from SenateHouse of Representatives
  6. Feb 18Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary CommitteeHouse of Representatives
  7. Mar 20Committee Hearing 10:20House of Representatives
  8. Apr 2Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 14 0 0House of Representatives
  9. Apr 3Amendment adopted, placed on calendarHouse of Representatives
  10. Apr 3Second reading, passed as amended, yeas 91 nays 0House of Representatives
  11. Apr 4Returned to Senate (12)Senate
  12. Apr 8Refused to concurSenate
  13. Apr 8Conference committee appointed Sitte Lyson NelsonSenate
  14. Apr 10Conference committee appointed Steiner Boehning HoganHouse of Representatives
  15. Apr 12Reported back from conference committee, placed on calendar (Senate accede)Senate
  16. Apr 16Conference committee report adoptedSenate
  17. Apr 16Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 21 nays 26Senate