l9n/ North Dakota

2013 Regular Session, 2013–2014

Senate Bill 2360

A BILL for an Act to provide for a legislative management study regarding the mitigation of risk involved in prepaying for agricultural seed, fertilizer, and various crop protection products.

Did not become law. It stopped in the House of Representatives on March 27, 2013. The 63rd Legislative Assembly has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

A BILL for an Act to provide for a legislative management study regarding the mitigation of risk involved in prepaying for agricultural seed, fertilizer, and various crop protection products.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the Senate

5 co-sponsors

Joe Miller, Jessica Bell, Jessica Haak, Joe Heilman, Dennis Johnson

Its course

January 28 to March 27, 2013, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action9 actions on 9 days

In the SenateJan 28 to Feb 1114 days

Industry, Business and LaborJan 28 to Feb 710 days

In the House of RepresentativesFeb 11 to Mar 27 · stopped44 days

AgricultureFeb 18 to Mar 2232 days

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

  • Industry, Business and Labor7–0

    Do pass · Feb 7

  • Senate, second reading45–0

    Passed · Feb 11

  • Agriculture8–4

    Do not pass · Mar 22 · 1 present

  • House of Representatives, second reading16–77

    Failed · Mar 27

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the Senate Jan 28 – Feb 11

  1. Jan 28Introduced and sent to Industry, Business and Labor
  2. Feb 6Heard in Industry, Business and Labor
  3. Feb 7Industry, Business and Labor recommended it, 7 to 0
  4. Feb 11Passed the Senate, 45 to 0

In the House of Representatives Feb 12 – Mar 27

  1. Feb 12Arrived in the House of Representatives
  2. Feb 18Read a first time and sent to Agriculture
  3. Mar 21Heard in Agriculture
  4. Mar 22Agriculture recommended against it, 8 to 4
  5. Mar 27Failed in the House of Representatives, 16 to 77
All 9 actions, as published
  1. Jan 28Introduced, first reading, referred Industry, Business and Labor CommitteeSenate
  2. Feb 6Committee Hearing 09:30Senate
  3. Feb 7Reported back, do pass, place on calendar 7 0 0Senate
  4. Feb 11Second reading, passed, yeas 45 nays 0Senate
  5. Feb 12Received from SenateHouse of Representatives
  6. Feb 18Introduced, first reading, referred Agriculture CommitteeHouse of Representatives
  7. Mar 21Committee Hearing 09:00House of Representatives
  8. Mar 22Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar 8 4 1House of Representatives
  9. Mar 27Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 16 nays 77House of Representatives