l9n/ North Dakota

2013 Regular Session, 2013–2014

Senate Concurrent Resolution 4006

Relating to limited legislative review of initiated measures substantially affecting the state budget; and to amend and reenact section 8 of article III of the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to the effective date of initiated measures.to create and enact a new section to article III of the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to approval of petitions for proposed initiated constitutional amendments by the attorney general before circulation.

Failed in the House of Representatives, 11 to 82, on April 9, 2013.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

A concurrent resolution to create and enact a new section to article III of the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to approval of petitions for proposed initiated constitutional amendments by the attorney general before circulation.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the Senate

5 co-sponsors

Rich Wardner, Larry Bellew, Al Carlson, Lawrence R. Klemin, Mike Nathe

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

  • Judiciary4–3

    Do pass as amended · Feb 14

  • Senate, second reading28–19

    Passed · Feb 19

  • Judiciary13–1

    Apr 4

  • House of Representatives, second reading11–82

    Failed · Apr 9

Amendments

Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

  • Senate committee amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Feb 15

  • House of Representatives committee amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Apr 5

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the Senate Jan 15 – Feb 19

  1. Jan 15Introduced and sent to Judiciary
  2. Jan 22Heard in Judiciary
  3. Feb 14Judiciary recommended it as amended, 4 to 3
  4. Feb 15Amended as the committee recommended
  5. Feb 19Adopted in the Senate, 28 to 19

In the House of Representatives Feb 20 – Apr 9

  1. Feb 20Arrived in the House of Representatives
  2. Feb 21Read a first time and sent to Judiciary
  3. Mar 27Heard in Judiciary
  4. Apr 4Judiciary reported it without a recommendation, 13 to 1
  5. Apr 5Amended as the committee recommended
  6. Apr 9Failed in the House of Representatives, 11 to 82
All 12 actions, as published
  1. Jan 15Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary CommitteeSenate
  2. Jan 22Committee Hearing 10:30Senate
  3. Feb 14Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 4 3 0Senate
  4. Feb 15Amendment adopted, placed on calendarSenate
  5. Feb 19Second reading, adopted yeas 28 nays 19Senate
  6. Feb 20Received from SenateHouse of Representatives
  7. Feb 21Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary CommitteeHouse of Representatives
  8. Mar 27Committee Hearing 09:40House of Representatives
  9. Apr 4Reported back amended, without recommendation 13 1 0House of Representatives
  10. Apr 5Amendment adopted, placed on calendarHouse of Representatives
  11. Apr 8Laid over one legislative dayHouse of Representatives
  12. Apr 9Second reading, failed to adopt yeas 11 nays 82House of Representatives