l9n/ North Dakota

2013 Regular Session, 2013–2014

Senate Concurrent Resolution 4012

A concurrent resolution directing the Legislative Management to study state alternatives to the statutory and regulatory requirements placed on North Dakota schools and school districts by the United States Department of Education, determine whether there are viable options to achieve the federal government's goals without having the federal government's oversight and involvement, and determine whether the federal fiscal impact is a significant and necessary factor in assenting to the continuance of federal government involvement in this state's educational process.

Filed with the Secretary of State, on March 22, 2013.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

A concurrent resolution directing the Legislative Management to study state alternatives to the statutory and regulatory requirements placed on North Dakota schools and school districts by the United States Department of Education, determine whether there are viable options to achieve the federal government's goals without having the federal government's oversight and involvement, and determine whether the federal fiscal impact is a significant and necessary factor in assenting to the continuance of federal government involvement in this state's educational process.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the Senate

5 co-sponsors

Ron Carlisle, Ralph Kilzer, Margaret Sitte, Vernon Laning, David S. Rust

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

Amendments

Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

  • Senate committee amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Feb 21

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the Senate Jan 31 – Feb 21

  1. Jan 31Introduced and sent to Education
  2. Feb 12Heard in Education
  3. Feb 20Education recommended it as amended, 4 to 2
  4. Feb 21Amended as the committee recommended
  5. Adopted in the Senate

In the House of Representatives Feb 22 – Mar 15

  1. Feb 22Arrived in the House of Representatives
  2. Feb 26Read a first time and sent to Education
  3. Mar 12Heard in Education
  4. Mar 13Education recommended it, 9 to 4
  5. Mar 15Adopted in the House of Representatives

In the Senate Mar 18

  1. Mar 18Returned to the Senate

In the House of Representatives Mar 20

  1. Mar 20Signed in the House of Representatives

In the Senate Mar 21

  1. Mar 21Signed in the Senate

In both houses Mar 22

  1. Mar 22Filed with the Secretary of State
All 14 actions, as published
  1. Jan 31Introduced, first reading, referred Education CommitteeSenate
  2. Feb 12Committee Hearing 10:00Senate
  3. Feb 20Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 4 2 0Senate
  4. Feb 21Amendment adopted, placed on calendarSenate
  5. Feb 21Second reading, adoptedSenate
  6. Feb 22Received from SenateHouse of Representatives
  7. Feb 26Introduced, first reading, referred Education CommitteeHouse of Representatives
  8. Mar 12Committee Hearing 09:00House of Representatives
  9. Mar 13Reported back, do pass, place on calendar 9 4 0House of Representatives
  10. Mar 15Second reading, adoptedHouse of Representatives
  11. Mar 18Returned to SenateSenate
  12. Mar 20Signed by SpeakerHouse of Representatives
  13. Mar 21Signed by PresidentSenate
  14. Mar 22Filed with Secretary Of State 03/22Both houses