l9n/ North Dakota

2015 Regular Session, 2015–2016

House Bill 1213

Relating to eligibility requirements for appointive offices.

Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate on March 30, 2015. The 64th Legislative Assembly has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact section 44-01-01 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to eligibility requirements for appointive offices.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

10 co-sponsors

Bill Devlin, Jason Dockter, William E. Kretschmar, Dan Ruby, Roscoe Streyle, Wayne A. Trottier, Robin Weisz, Tom Campbell, Lonnie J. Laffen, Ronald Sorvaag

Its course

January 13 to March 30, 2015, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action10 actions on 8 days

In the House of RepresentativesJan 13 to Feb 321 days

Political SubdivisionsJan 13 to Jan 3017 days

In the SenateFeb 3 to Mar 30 · stopped55 days

Political SubdivisionsFeb 23 to Mar 2732 days

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

  • Political Subdivisions10–3

    Do pass as amended · Jan 30 · 1 present

  • House of Representatives, second reading58–34

    Passed · Feb 3

  • Political Subdivisions6–0

    Do not pass · Mar 27

  • Senate, second reading1–45

    Failed · Mar 30

Amendments

Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

  • House of Representatives committee amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Feb 2

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Jan 13 – Feb 3

  1. Jan 13Introduced and sent to Political Subdivisions
  2. Jan 22Heard in Political Subdivisions
  3. Jan 30Political Subdivisions recommended it as amended, 10 to 3
  4. Feb 2Amended as the committee recommended
  5. Feb 3Passed the House of Representatives, 58 to 34

In the Senate Feb 23 – Mar 30

  1. Feb 23Arrived in the Senate
  2. Read a first time and sent to Political Subdivisions
  3. Mar 27Heard in Political Subdivisions
  4. Political Subdivisions recommended against it, 6 to 0
  5. Mar 30Failed in the Senate, 1 to 45
All 10 actions, as published
  1. Jan 13Introduced, first reading, referred Political Subdivisions CommitteeHouse of Representatives
  2. Jan 22Committee Hearing 11:15House of Representatives
  3. Jan 30Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 10 3 1House of Representatives
  4. Feb 2Amendment adopted, placed on calendarHouse of Representatives
  5. Feb 3Second reading, passed, yeas 58 nays 34House of Representatives
  6. Feb 23Received from HouseSenate
  7. Feb 23Introduced, first reading, referred Political Subdivisions CommitteeSenate
  8. Mar 27Committee Hearing 09:30Senate
  9. Mar 27Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar 6 0 0Senate
  10. Mar 30Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 1 nays 45Senate