l9n/ North Dakota

2015 Regular Session, 2015–2016

House Bill 1322

Relating to allowable costs in improvements by special assessments; and to provide for application.

Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate on March 25, 2015. The 64th Legislative Assembly has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

A BILL for an Act to provide for a legislative management study of special assessments.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

11 co-sponsors

Wesley R. Belter, Jason Dockter, Craig Headland, Scott Louser, Mark S. Owens, Karen M. Rohr, Roscoe Streyle, Nathan Toman, Oley Larsen, Larry Luick, Jessica Bell

Its course

January 13 to March 25, 2015, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action10 actions on 9 days

In the House of RepresentativesJan 13 to Feb 1937 days

Political SubdivisionsJan 13 to Feb 1634 days

In the SenateFeb 19 to Mar 25 · stopped34 days

Political SubdivisionsFeb 23 to Mar 2429 days

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

Amendments

Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

  • House of Representatives committee amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Feb 17

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Jan 13 – Feb 19

  1. Jan 13Introduced and sent to Political Subdivisions
  2. Feb 6Heard in Political Subdivisions
  3. Feb 16Political Subdivisions recommended it as amended, 14 to 0
  4. Feb 17Amended as the committee recommended
  5. Feb 19Passed the House of Representatives, 93 to 0

In the Senate Feb 23 – Mar 25

  1. Feb 23Arrived in the Senate
  2. Read a first time and sent to Political Subdivisions
  3. Mar 20Heard in Political Subdivisions
  4. Mar 24Political Subdivisions recommended against it, 6 to 0
  5. Mar 25Failed in the Senate, 5 to 41
All 10 actions, as published
  1. Jan 13Introduced, first reading, referred Political Subdivisions CommitteeHouse of Representatives
  2. Feb 6Committee Hearing 10:00House of Representatives
  3. Feb 16Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 14 0 0House of Representatives
  4. Feb 17Amendment adopted, placed on calendarHouse of Representatives
  5. Feb 19Second reading, passed, yeas 93 nays 0House of Representatives
  6. Feb 23Received from HouseSenate
  7. Feb 23Introduced, first reading, referred Political Subdivisions CommitteeSenate
  8. Mar 20Committee Hearing 09:00Senate
  9. Mar 24Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar 6 0 0Senate
  10. Mar 25Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 5 nays 41Senate