l9n/ North Dakota

2015 Regular Session, 2015–2016

House Bill 1459

Relating to voter approval of indirect funding methods for acquisition, improvements, or construction by or on behalf of a political subdivision of any property or structure and to require a school district to obtain approval of the superintendent of public instruction for acquisition, improvements, or construction of any property or structure financed through indirect funding methods; and to provide an effective date.

Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate on March 31, 2015. The 64th Legislative Assembly has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

A BILL for an Act to provide for a legislative management study of use of a building authority or other methods to finance public building projects as an alternative to political subdivision bonding.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

5 co-sponsors

Mark A. Dosch, Jim Kasper, Blair Thoreson, Jerry Klein, Rich Wardner

Its course

January 19 to March 31, 2015, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action10 actions on 8 days

In the House of RepresentativesJan 19 to Feb 2537 days

Political SubdivisionsJan 19 to Feb 2436 days

In the SenateFeb 25 to Mar 31 · stopped34 days

Political SubdivisionsFeb 26 to Mar 2729 days

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

  • Political Subdivisions13–0

    Do pass as amended · Feb 24 · 1 present

  • House of Representatives, second reading87–5

    Passed · Feb 25

  • Political Subdivisions6–0

    Do not pass · Mar 27

  • Senate, second reading0–46

    Failed · Mar 31

Amendments

Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

  • House of Representatives committee amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Feb 24

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Jan 19 – Feb 25

  1. Jan 19Introduced and sent to Political Subdivisions
  2. Feb 13Heard in Political Subdivisions
  3. Feb 24Political Subdivisions recommended it as amended, 13 to 0
  4. Amended as the committee recommended
  5. Feb 25Passed the House of Representatives, 87 to 5

In the Senate Feb 26 – Mar 31

  1. Feb 26Arrived in the Senate
  2. Read a first time and sent to Political Subdivisions
  3. Mar 26Heard in Political Subdivisions
  4. Mar 27Political Subdivisions recommended against it, 6 to 0
  5. Mar 31Failed in the Senate, 0 to 46
All 10 actions, as published
  1. Jan 19Introduced, first reading, referred Political Subdivisions CommitteeHouse of Representatives
  2. Feb 13Committee Hearing 09:30House of Representatives
  3. Feb 24Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 13 0 1House of Representatives
  4. Feb 24Amendment adopted, placed on calendarHouse of Representatives
  5. Feb 25Second reading, passed, yeas 87 nays 5House of Representatives
  6. Feb 26Received from HouseSenate
  7. Feb 26Introduced, first reading, referred Political Subdivisions CommitteeSenate
  8. Mar 26Committee Hearing 10:00Senate
  9. Mar 27Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar 6 0 0Senate
  10. Mar 31Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 0 nays 46Senate