l9n/ North Dakota

2015 Regular Session, 2015–2016

House Concurrent Resolution 3018

A concurrent resolution urging Congress to pursue enactment of the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act introduced by Senator Paul in February 2013 requiring Congress to approve every major rule proposed by the Executive Branch which has an annual economic impact of one hundred million dollars or more, before it can be enforced on the American people.

Filed with the Secretary of State, on April 6, 2015.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

A concurrent resolution urging Congress to pursue enactment of the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act introduced by Senator Paul in February 2013 requiring Congress to approve every major rule proposed by the Executive Branch which has an annual economic impact of one hundred million dollars or more, before it can be enforced on the American people.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

6 co-sponsors

Jeff Delzer, Scott Louser, Blair Thoreson, Jonathan Casper, Gary A. Lee, Joe Miller

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

Amendments

Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

  • House of Representatives committee amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Feb 10

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Jan 19 – Feb 12

  1. Jan 19Introduced and sent to Government and Veterans Affairs
  2. Feb 6Heard in Government and Veterans Affairs
  3. Feb 9Government and Veterans Affairs recommended it as amended, 8 to 3
  4. Feb 10Amended as the committee recommended
  5. Feb 12Adopted in the House of Representatives, 70 to 21

In the Senate Feb 20 – Mar 31

  1. Feb 20Arrived in the Senate
  2. Feb 23Read a first time and sent to Government and Veterans Affairs
  3. Mar 27Heard in Government and Veterans Affairs
  4. Government and Veterans Affairs recommended it, 4 to 3
  5. Mar 31Adopted in the Senate

In the House of Representatives Apr 1

  1. Apr 1Returned to the House of Representatives

In the Senate Apr 6

  1. Apr 6Signed in the Senate

In the House of Representatives Apr 6

  1. Apr 6Signed in the House of Representatives

In both houses Apr 6

  1. Apr 6Filed with the Secretary of State
All 14 actions, as published
  1. Jan 19Introduced, first reading, referred Government and Veterans Affairs CommitteeHouse of Representatives
  2. Feb 6Committee Hearing 08:30House of Representatives
  3. Feb 9Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 8 3 3House of Representatives
  4. Feb 10Amendment adopted, placed on calendarHouse of Representatives
  5. Feb 12Second reading, adopted yeas 70 nays 21House of Representatives
  6. Feb 20Received from HouseSenate
  7. Feb 23Introduced, first reading, referred Government and Veterans Affairs CommitteeSenate
  8. Mar 27Committee Hearing 09:45Senate
  9. Mar 27Reported back, do pass, place on calendar 4 3 0Senate
  10. Mar 31Second reading, adoptedSenate
  11. Apr 1Returned to HouseHouse of Representatives
  12. Apr 6Signed by PresidentSenate
  13. Apr 6Signed by SpeakerHouse of Representatives
  14. Apr 6Filed with Secretary Of State 04/06Both houses