l9n/ North Dakota

2017 Regular Session, 2017–2018

House Bill 1282

Relating to the use of assessment money by the corn utilization council and the dry pea and lentil council; and to amend and reenact section 4‑01‑26 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to limitations on commodity groups.

Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate on March 17, 2017. The 65th Legislative Assembly has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

A BILL for an Act to provide for reports to the legislative management; and to provide for a legislative management study regarding agricultural commodity groups.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

2 co-sponsors

Keith Kempenich, Chet Pollert

Its course

January 9 to March 17, 2017, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action10 actions on 8 days

In the House of RepresentativesJan 9 to Feb 2244 days

AgricultureJan 9 to Feb 2042 days

In the SenateFeb 22 to Mar 17 · stopped23 days

AgricultureFeb 22 to Mar 1622 days

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

  • Agriculture14–0

    Do pass as amended · Feb 20

  • House of Representatives, second reading90–0

    Passed · Feb 22

  • Agriculture5–0

    Do not pass · Mar 16 · 1 present

  • Senate, second reading0–46

    Failed · Mar 17

Amendments

Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

  • House of Representatives committee amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Feb 21

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Jan 9 – Feb 22

  1. Jan 9Introduced and sent to Agriculture
  2. Feb 9Heard in Agriculture
  3. Feb 20Agriculture recommended it as amended, 14 to 0
  4. Feb 21Amended as the committee recommended
  5. Feb 22Passed the House of Representatives, 90 to 0

In the Senate Feb 22 – Mar 17

  1. Feb 22Arrived in the Senate
  2. Read a first time and sent to Agriculture
  3. Mar 9Heard in Agriculture
  4. Mar 16Agriculture recommended against it, 5 to 0
  5. Mar 17Failed in the Senate, 0 to 46
All 10 actions, as published
  1. Jan 9Introduced, first reading, referred Agriculture CommitteeHouse of Representatives
  2. Feb 9Committee Hearing 09:00House of Representatives
  3. Feb 20Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 14 0 0House of Representatives
  4. Feb 21Amendment adopted, placed on calendarHouse of Representatives
  5. Feb 22Second reading, passed, yeas 90 nays 0House of Representatives
  6. Feb 22Received from HouseSenate
  7. Feb 22Introduced, first reading, referred Agriculture CommitteeSenate
  8. Mar 9Committee Hearing 10:00Senate
  9. Mar 16Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar 5 0 1Senate
  10. Mar 17Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 0 nays 46Senate