l9n/ North Dakota

2017 Regular Session, 2017–2018

House Bill 1357

A BILL for an Act to provide for a legislative management study regarding the effects of placing limits on school district levies on the equitable application of the education funding formula.

Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate on March 13, 2017. The 65th Legislative Assembly has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

A BILL for an Act to provide for a legislative management study regarding the effects of placing limits on school district levies on the equitable application of the education funding formula.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

6 co-sponsors

Mary Johnson, Shannon Roers Jones, Cynthia Schreiber-Beck, Jonathan Casper, Erin Oban, Ronald Sorvaag

Its course

January 16 to March 13, 2017, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action11 actions on 9 days

In the House of RepresentativesJan 16 to Feb 621 days

Finance and TaxationJan 16 to Jan 19 · moved on3 days

EducationJan 19 to Jan 3112 days

In the SenateFeb 6 to Mar 13 · stopped35 days

Finance and TaxationFeb 17 to Mar 1021 days

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

  • Education13–1

    Do pass · Jan 31

  • House of Representatives, second reading81–9

    Passed · Feb 6

  • Finance and Taxation6–0

    Do not pass · Mar 10

  • Senate, second reading0–45

    Failed · Mar 13

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Jan 16 – Feb 6

  1. Jan 16Introduced and sent to Finance and Taxation
  2. Jan 19Sent to Education
  3. Jan 30Heard in Education
  4. Jan 31Education recommended it, 13 to 1
  5. Feb 6Passed the House of Representatives, 81 to 9

In the Senate Feb 17 – Mar 13

  1. Feb 17Arrived in the Senate
  2. Read a first time and sent to Finance and Taxation
  3. Mar 8Heard in Finance and Taxation
  4. Mar 10Finance and Taxation recommended against it, 6 to 0
  5. Mar 13Failed in the Senate, 0 to 45
All 11 actions, as published
  1. Jan 16Introduced, first reading, referred Finance and Taxation CommitteeHouse of Representatives
  2. Jan 19Request return from committeeHouse of Representatives
  3. Jan 19Rereferred to EducationHouse of Representatives
  4. Jan 30Committee Hearing 09:00House of Representatives
  5. Jan 31Reported back, do pass, place on calendar 13 1 0House of Representatives
  6. Feb 6Second reading, passed, yeas 81 nays 9House of Representatives
  7. Feb 17Received from HouseSenate
  8. Feb 17Introduced, first reading, referred Finance and Taxation CommitteeSenate
  9. Mar 8Committee Hearing 09:30Senate
  10. Mar 10Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar 6 0 0Senate
  11. Mar 13Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 0 nays 45Senate