l9n/ North Dakota

2017 Regular Session, 2017–2018

House Concurrent Resolution 3002

A concurrent resolution requesting the Legislative Management to consider studying the operation, management, conditions, standards, and supervision of city, county, and regional correctional facilities and other potential means to improve the rehabilitative function of city, county, and regional correctional facilities and a possible transition of the supervision of city, county, and regional correctional facilities from the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to the Attorney General.

Filed with the Secretary of State, on March 21, 2017.

What it does

The synopsis the Legislative Assembly published with the bill.

A concurrent resolution requesting the Legislative Management to consider studying the operation, management, conditions, standards, and supervision of city, county, and regional correctional facilities and other potential means to improve the rehabilitative function of city, county, and regional correctional facilities and a possible transition of the supervision of city, county, and regional correctional facilities from the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to the Attorney General.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

7 co-sponsors

Randy Boehning, Dennis Johnson, Matthew Ruby, Denton Zubke, Brad Bekkedahl, John Grabinger, Jessica Bell

Votes

Yeas to nays, as the Legislative Assembly recorded them. Committee votes are set in.

  • Judiciary13–1

    Do pass as amended · Jan 19 · 1 present

  • House of Representatives, adoption88–1

    Passed · Jan 24

  • Judiciary6–0

    Do pass · Mar 14

Amendments

Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

  • House of Representatives committee amendmentAdopted

    Adopted Jan 20

Text

Each version as the Legislative Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the Legislative Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Jan 6 – Jan 24

  1. Jan 6Introduced and sent to Judiciary
  2. Jan 16Heard in Judiciary
  3. Jan 19Judiciary recommended it as amended, 13 to 1
  4. Jan 20Amended as the committee recommended
  5. Jan 24Adopted in the House of Representatives, 88 to 1

In the Senate Feb 20 – Mar 15

  1. Feb 20Arrived in the Senate
  2. Read a first time and sent to Judiciary
  3. Mar 6Heard in Judiciary
  4. Mar 14Judiciary recommended it, 6 to 0
  5. Mar 15Adopted in the Senate

In the House of Representatives Mar 16

  1. Mar 16Returned to the House of Representatives

In the Senate Mar 17

  1. Mar 17Signed in the Senate

In the House of Representatives Mar 20

  1. Mar 20Signed in the House of Representatives

In both houses Mar 21

  1. Mar 21Filed with the Secretary of State
All 14 actions, as published
  1. Jan 6Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary CommitteeHouse of Representatives
  2. Jan 16Committee Hearing 10:40House of Representatives
  3. Jan 19Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 13 1 1House of Representatives
  4. Jan 20Amendment adopted, placed on calendarHouse of Representatives
  5. Jan 24Second reading, adopted yeas 88 nays 1House of Representatives
  6. Feb 20Received from HouseSenate
  7. Feb 20Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary CommitteeSenate
  8. Mar 6Committee Hearing 10:30Senate
  9. Mar 14Reported back, do pass, place on calendar 6 0 0Senate
  10. Mar 15Second reading, adoptedSenate
  11. Mar 16Returned to HouseHouse of Representatives
  12. Mar 17Signed by PresidentSenate
  13. Mar 20Signed by SpeakerHouse of Representatives
  14. Mar 21Filed with Secretary Of State 03/21Both houses